IR Home

  Outages and Alerts

  Latest News

  Virus Information

  Computing Policies

  Wireless Networking

  Wireless Networking
    Hot Spot Maps


  Passwords/PIN's

  Training Seminars

  System Schedules

  Statistics/Monitoring

  IR Forums

  Behind the Scenes
    Lecture Series


  IR Faculty/Staff
    Survey Results
Results of 2002 Faculty/Staff Information Resources Survey


Results of 2002
Faculty/Staff Information Resources Survey

To: The University Community

From: Jerry DeSanto, Associate Provost for Information Resources

Date: August 1, 2002

Subject: Results of 2002 Faculty/Staff Information Resources Survey

In April the IR Division conducted its first ever comprehensive services survey on the web. I am pleased to provide this report of the results of the survey. I want to thank AIRO and Bonnie Thomas-Sharksnas, in particular for all the fine work on helping us design the survey and compiling the results. 53 faculty members and 131 staff members provided a wealth of meaningful information to us. This feedback coupled with the feedback we expect to receive from students in a survey we are preparing for the fall will be very helpful in identifying applications we need to focus on, services we need to improve, and future initiatives we need to pursue. We hope you find the highlights of the results featured in this report useful.

This document is also available in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF formats.


Section I Applications

Section I of the survey dealt with the usage of and evaluation of various University-provided software applications. Since many of the applications listed in the survey are used solely by one department or college the frequencies for usage and satisfaction are relatively low. The applications used most frequently were the Academic Web Server at 60%, Oracle at 30%, and SPSS at 18%. 85% of the respondents who indicated that they use the Academic web server reported that they were very satisfied or satisfied with the Academic Web Server. Oracle’s satisfaction rates were about 80% and SPSS logged about a 75% satisfaction rate


II. APPLICATIONS/SERVICES USAGE (% OF RESPONDENTS)

DAILY

WEEKLY

MONTHLY

NOT USED IN
LAST 6 MONTHS

NEVER

BBoard

41.9

20.1

15.1

11.2

11.7

Royal-News

8.4

70.2

11.2

3.9

6.2

Campus Pipeline

11.3

19.8

22.6

16.9

29.4

Campus Web Site (www.scranton.edu)

41.4

35.9

15.2

4.8

2.8

Blackboard

4.6

9.8

13.3

15.6

56.6

Microsoft Office

77.7

9.5

1.7

1.7

9.5

UIS

25.7

38.3

18.9

7.4

9.7

Banner Administrative System

26.6

16.4

20.3

13

23.7

DAILY

WEEKLY

MONTHLY

NOT USED IN
LAST 6 MONTHS

NEVER

UNOS (campus Netscape Messenger e-mail)

64.1

19.3

8.8

3.3

4.4

UNOS (campus CS&T calendar)

25.9

10.0

5.3

4.1

54.7

McAfee Antivirus

38.2

19.7

27.5

3.4

11.2

Software

Netscape Navigator (Browser)

77.9

10.5

3.3

2.2

6.1

Internet Explorer (Browser)

43.0

17.9

10.1

3.4

25.7

Usenet News

3.0

2.4

5.4

6.5

82.7

On-line Public Catalog (DRA)

6.9

17.1

22.3

9.7

44.0

DAILY

WEEKLY

MONTHLY

NOT USED IN
LAST 6 MONTHS

NEVER

Electronic Reserves (ERes)

4.0

11.4

16.0

11.4

57.1

Full-text Library Journals

5.2

12.1

20.7

13.2

48.9

Internet Access to Library Indexes and Abstracts

4.6

15.0

23.1

12.1

45.1

Remote Access to Library Indexes and Abstracts

1.7

12.8

18.6

9.9

57.0

II. APPLICATIONS/SERVICES QUALITY (% OF RESPONDENTS)

VERY
SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

VERY
DISSATISFIED

BBoard

30.0

62.3

5.8

1.9

Royal-News

24.4

70.3

4.9

0.6

Campus Pipeline

12.2

59.4

23.6

4.9

Campus Web Site (www.scranton.edu)

24.8

53.2

17.7

4.3

Blackboard

18.4

67.1

10.5

4.0

Microsoft Office

42.2

52.8

4.4

0.6

UIS

25.1

64.5

8.4

1.9

Banner Administrative System

17.0

26.7

21.5

34.8

VERY
SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

VERY
DISSATISFIED

UNOS (campus Netscape Messenger e-mail)

32.4

55.8

8.8

2.9

UNOS (campus CS&T calendar)

29.2

61.1

5.6

4.2

McAfee Antivirus Software

37.6

52.2

7.0

3.2

Netscape Navigator (Browser)

38.8

44.7

11.8

4.7

Internet Explorer (Browser)

34.1

57.3

7.8

0.8

Usenet News

4.8

71.4

9.5

14.2

On-line Public Catalog (DRA)

26.3

64.2

7.4

2.1

VERY
SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

VERY
DISSATISFIED

Electronic Reserves (ERes)

24.6

58.0

11.6

5.8

Full-text Library Journals

30.5

58.5

9.8

1.2

Internet Access to Library Indexes and Abstracts

35.2

53.9

9.9

1.1

Remote Access to Library Indexes and Abstracts

33.8

52.1

9.9

4.2


III. SERVICES USAGE (% OF RESPONDENTS)

DAILY

WEEKLY

MONTHLY

NOT USED IN
LAST 6 MONTHS

NEVER

Telephone Services

88.2

3.4

1.7

3.9

2.8

Voice Mail

76.3

7.9

2.8

1.7

11.3

Royal Card System

36.8

19.5

17.8

9.8

16.1

Campus Data Network

25.0

4.2

4.2

2.4

64.3

Internet Connectivity

67.3

5.8

0.6

1.8

24.6

Technology Support Center

4.5

17.4

52.2

20.8

5.1

Microcomputer Hardware Set up

3.5

1.2

19.3

44.4

31.6

Microcomputer Hardware Repair

3.5

2.3

18.7

40.9

34.5

DAILY

WEEKLY

MONTHLY

NOT USED IN
LAST 6 MONTHS

NEVER

On-site Support of Office PC's

4.1

3.5

40.4

39.8

12.3

On-site Support of Lab PC's

5.4

3.0

9.6

13.2

68.9

Desktop Consultation

3.6

1.2

14.3

21.4

59.5

OIT Set-up/Delivery Services

3.0

3.0

25.0

35.7

33.3

IR Training Seminars

1.2

1.2

14.6

39.8

43.3

IR Monthly Forums

0.0

0.6

25.4

24.3

49.7

Weinberg Library Instruction

1.2

3.0

7.7

22.6

65.6

DAILY

WEEKLY

MONTHLY

NOT USED IN
LAST 6 MONTHS

NEVER

Web Development

2.4

2.4

7.6

21.8

65.9

Application Development

1.2

1.8

4.8

13.2

79.0

III. SERVICES QUALITY (% OF RESPONDENTS)

VERY
SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

VERY
DISSATISFIED

Telephone Services

41.3

53.9

3.6

1.2

Voice Mail

38.8

48.7

7.9

4.6

Royal Card System

31.0

62.8

5.5

0.7

Campus Data Network

27.1

61.0

8.5

3.4

Internet Connectivity

32.6

50.4

14.0

3.1

Technology Support Center

21.4

57.2

13.1

8.3

Microcomputer Hardware Set up

55.6

41.7

0.9

1.9

Microcomputer Hardware Repair

52.3

39.3

5.6

2.8

VERY
SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

VERY
DISSATISFIED

On-site Support of Office PC's

49.3

39.1

7.5

4.1

On-site Support of Lab PC's

43.8

47.9

6.3

2.1

Desktop Consultation

36.7

53.3

6.7

3.3

OIT Set-up/Delivery Services

28.4

56.9

10.1

4.6

IR Training Seminars

22.3

52.1

14.9

10.6

IR Monthly Forums

15.6

75.3

6.5

2.6

Weinberg Library Instruction

46.4

48.8

3.6

1.8

VERY
SATISFIED

SATISFIED

DISSATISFIED

VERY
DISSATISFIED

Web Development

15.8

50.9

21.1

12.3

Application Development

15.2

57.6

9.1

18.2


IV. NEW INITIATIVES

VERY STRONGLY
SUPPORT THIS
INVESTMENT

STRONLY
SUPPORT THIS
INVESTMENT

STRONG OPPOSITION
TO THIS
INVESTMENT

VERY STRONG
OPPOSITION TO THIS
THIS INVESTMENT

NO
OPINION

Wireless Network Access

30.5

31.7

4.9

1.8

31.1

Expanded E-Commerce Services

13.4

18.3

9.1

3.0

56.1

PDA's

8.6

24.1

11.1

3.7

52.5

Internet II Participation

13.3

21.8

4.2

0.6

60.0

Single University Web Portal

27.3

18.2

5.5

1.2

47.9

Single Log-on/Authentication

42.4

19.4

3.6

1.8

32.7

On-Line Degree Audit Reports

15.9

16.5

5.5

2.4

59.8

VERY STRONGLY
SUPPORT THIS
INVESTMENT

STRONLY
SUPPORT THIS
INVESTMENT

STRONG OPPOSITION
TO THIS
INVESTMENT

VERY STRONG
OPPOSITION TO THIS
THIS INVESTMENT

NO
OPINION

On-Line Course Evaluation and Reports

14.7

23.3

8.6

2.5

50.9

Royal Card Purchases in Private Businesses

15.2

12.1

7.9

10.9

53.9

IP Telephony

9.6

8.0

3.7

3.1

76.5

Additional Mediated Classrooms

31.1

21.1

2.5

1.2

44.1


Section V Other Questions

Section V addressed a series of additional questions.

The first question asked, “When I have a computer problem, I call………….

The responses were as follows:

  • 45% call the Technology Support Center

  • 21% call someone else in the IR Division

  • 17% call a computer specialist in their own department

  • 10% call a friend or colleague

  • 1% calls the IR Training Coordinator

  • 6% said none of the above

The second question dealt with the PC replacement cycle.

70% indicated that they were satisfied with the PC replacement program, while 30% indicated they were not satisfied. When asked how frequently PC’s should be replaced on campus, 47% indicated 3 years, 35% indicated 2 years, while 10% indicated 4 years.

The next question focused on the optimal timing for faculty training on new technologies.

37% said that the summer was the best time, 22% opted for Intersession, 20% indicated mid-semester, and 19% voted for beginning of the semester.

The next question asked, “How do you learn about what we’ve been doing”.

E-mail received the highest percentage at 97%, followed by print mailings at 95%, Royal News at 92%, The Weinberg Library Newsletter at 66%, IR Forums and Training Seminars at 55%, and IR Web Pages at 45%.


Search / Site Map / Ask Scranton
Choosing Scranton / My.Scranton / Campus Contacts

Disclaimer: The University of Scranton does not endorse views or opinions
found on pages directly or indirectly accessed from our Web site.


© 2008 The University of Scranton
Home